Newsletter
Google Left Banner
Verizon Joins CDN Movement
19 Nov, 2008
Verizon announced they are launching their own content delivery network (CDN) to “distribute content that Verizon contracts for directly with content owners like movie studios, TV networks, video rental sites and entertainment services…” The CDN is being phased in through a business relationship with Velocix, a U.K.-based digital asset-delivery network provider. Velocix will provide CDN services utilizing p2p technology to Verizon. "Verizon is now positioned to offer content owners and video distributors a competitive choice in delivering their services to our broadband customers," said Marjorie Hsu, Verizon vice president for network technology. "With our new delivery capability, content owners will be drawn to our networks, and our customers will be the beneficiaries of a broad range of compelling content services."
Verizon joins an increasingly crowded CDN landscape. CDN’s are growing as broadband and high capacity network owners aim to leverage their core networks for the growing business of content delivery to a plethora of network connected devices. By creating their own CDN capability, Verizon and others eliminate the need of contracting with other transport networks to distribute content, thus hopefully increasing margins. Companies like Verizon may be attractive to content owners, because in addition to robust CDNs, they also offer millions of existing broadband customer relationships. The first example of this Verizon collaboration is Starz Entertainment's Starz Play broadband entertainment service, which “provides unlimited online subscription access to more than 2,500 movies and video selections on demand, in addition to a live stream of the Starz premium pay TV movie channel.” It’s yet another example of broadband service providers trying to leverage core strengths for competitive advantage.
Level 3 Looks Beyond Transport to CDN
05 Oct, 2007
Level 3 is looking to leverage the exploding business of content delivery and has lowered its CDN pricing to better compete with companies like Akamai and Limelight. Level 3 has basically lowered its CDN pricing to match its IP transport costs. Lisa Guillaume, VP of CDN Product Development for Level 3 tells Light Reading, "We have a significant advantage here.” Level 3 suggests that they have competitive advantage because they own the actual transport network, whereas their competitors have to lease transport for their CDN solution.
CDN is one of the fastest growing applications in telecom. As more and more websites, service providers, and content distributors aim to deliver content across multiple platforms, CDN providers have tremendous room for growth. Level 3 expanded its CDN product line through its acquisition of Savvis.
Read more about Level 3’s CDN strategy on this Light Reading post.
DirecTV Rolling Out VOD Lite, Quietly
30 Aug, 2007
DirecTV is beta testing a near video on demand (VOD) service, utilizing the Internet as its content delivery network (CDN). A far cry from cable and IPTV VOD offerings, DirecTV’s VOD product is not trying to match their competitors head on. Rather, they are using the service to at least assert that they too have a VOD offering. The service has limited content options, but does allow fast forward, rewind, and pause features. The content is downloaded to a partioned hard drive on the subscriber’s set-top-box.
Give DirecTV credit. They are not sitting around and complaining about their platform’s deficiencies (namely the one way nature of their satellite technology, which doesn’t allow for a return path). They are pursuing all avenues that provide them a means to compete. Whether it’s BPL for broadband, or this VOD lite scheme, DirecTV is not conceding their future to anyone. Time will tell whether these strategies are enough. I for one question whether this patchwork for a triple play (never mind wireless) strategy will work over the long term. Seems like the challenges are quite high, and when compared with there competitors offerings, may prove to be inadequate.
For more info on DirecTV's VOD strategy, check out this Light Reading article, and this DBS Talk forum.
About Telecompetitor
Channel
Webinars/Events
Upcoming Webinars
Packet Optical Networks – Enabling Your Future
Dec 16, 2008
Upcoming Events
NTCA Wireless Symposium
Jan 7-9, 2009 - Austin, TX
Featured Article
Should Telephone Service be Free?
12 Oct, 2008
Comcast announced a new promotion last week that offers 12 months of free basic cable service for new customers who also sign up for an additional service. Customers who don’t want an additional service can get Comcast’s basic service of about 20 -30 channels for $10/month. The promotion is tied to the digital TV transition of February 2009 and entices potential customers to avoid the transition “hassle” by getting “free” cable service. “The simple fact is that basic cable is the easiest path through the digital transition and now consumers can get it for free,” said Derek Harrar, General Manager and Senior Vice President, Video Services for Comcast in a company statement. This move is similar to strategies pursued by other video service providers, who are hoping to leverage the digital TV transition for new subscriber additions.
But is this strategy a leading indicator for the future? Should basic core services like basic cable and basic telephone service be offered for free, used as a “carrot” to entice customers to buy “more important” services like broadband? Maybe a very basic phone service, with no LD, access to landline 911, and maybe outgoing service only (to avoid telemarketers) should be a free component of a bundled offering. Such a wireline service may appeal to a customer who previously cut the cord for wireless only, but also needs broadband. There is a growing portion of the population who find the value of traditional wireline phone service elsewhere – either through wireless or broadband/IP services. But, if they could get the security of landline 911, and an extra dial tone in their home as a free value add for subscribing to broadband (or video from a telco’s perspective), maybe a telco’s bundled offering may look more attractive than a comparable cable offering. I realize this idea is not appealing to the hundreds of ILECs who are a part of the current access/settlement system (in fact, it couldn’t work in the context of today’s regulatory structure), but I wonder whether it’s inevitable. In this possible future scenario, the current settlement system adapts to broadband as the underlying service, as opposed to voice.
This scenario cuts both ways. From a cable company’s perspective, a growing portion of the population is turning to the Internet as a source for their video content, and no longer see value in paying for a broad package of video as a part of a traditional subscription pay-TV service. But, if they could receive basic TV (which includes local broadcast affiliates) as a free value add for buying broadband, maybe the cable bundle is more attractive. In a true IP/broadband world, very basic phone and video service is relatively easy to deliver, and has little impact on bandwidth and network performance. Maybe the digital transition is opening the door to a future where free basic services are a regular component of a bundled offering. Thoughts?

digg this story
google
