<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://telecompetitor.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Competition</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Cinergy MetroNet Launches TV Caller ID</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/812</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;inline_left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.telecompetitor.com/images/cinergy.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; height=&quot;37&quot; width=&quot;126&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cinergymetronet.com/&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;Cinergy MetroNet&lt;/a&gt;, an Indiana based FTTH triple play provider, has launched TV Caller ID and other converged applications, including call logs and a networked address book. Cinergy includes the service, marketed as Caller ID on TV, as a free value add for its triple play customers and for $2.95/month for non-triple play customers. Cinergy MetroNet uses the &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.integra5.com/home/default.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;tag&quot;&gt;Integra5&lt;/a&gt; Converged Services platform.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/812#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/167">caller ID</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/80">Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/cwatch">cWatch</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:22:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">812 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Qwest IPTV Service Met With Skepticism in its Own Backyard</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/127</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Qwest’s bid for a cable TV franchise in Broomfield, CO, a suburb of Denver, was met with much skepticism by the city council. Issues including poor past performance by Qwest and inadequate build out requirements were raised. What was also interesting is skepticism of IPTV technology, with one councilman saying it’s not ready for prime time yet. Comcast was present at this meeting, but didn’t speak. Apparently they didn’t have to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out this Rocky Mountain News &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/tech/article/0,2777,DRMN_23910_5548724,00.html&quot;&gt; article&lt;/a&gt; for the details.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/127#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/58">IPTV</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/45">Qwest</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 09:39:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">127 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Houston Becoming Epicenter for Triple Play Competition</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/72</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With two IPTV providers, including AT&amp;amp;T’s U-verse TV and Optical Entertainment Network’s Fision service, Comcast, and the usual DBS suspects, Houston is a great laboratory for triple play competition. Competitive tactics include increases in HD channel availability, higher Internet bandwidth speeds, and a whopping 400 channel offering by Fision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cable 360 Net offers more &lt;a href=&quot;//www.cable360.net/competition/dbs/22970.html”&quot;&gt; insight&lt;/a&gt; into these competitive implications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/72#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/70">Fision</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/71">OEN</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/47">Triple Play</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I Like My DSL Naked, Thank You</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/68</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What was once frowned upon and kept quiet, is now rising to the forefront.  AT&amp;amp;T is actively marketing naked DSL, which allows a subscriber to get DSL service without an underlying voice line, in the Detroit market. AT&amp;amp;T is bundling naked DSL with Cingular wireless service in an attempt to appeal to customers who have cut their landline voice.  While this is a somewhat remarkable story for a company that has a voice landline legacy, it is really of no surprise. AT&amp;amp;T realizes that a growing population of consumers no longer needs or values landline voice service. This exposed example is one of many to come for most legacy voice carriers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Get more insight from this Detroit News &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070324/BIZ04/703240362/1013&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/68#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/20">AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/64">DSL</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should Cable Give In and Embrace IPTV?</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/55</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There are all kinds of predictions surrounding IPTV, including it’s the future of television as we know it. Proponents argue that the power of IPTV, which at its core is choice, is undeniable and even unstopable. The argument being that once consumers get a taste, they won’t look back and any service provider who tries to maintain the status quo of content control will lose. This argument pits the cable industry and the telecom industry squarely against each other.  Cable being the status quo and telecom being the potential provider of video choice. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s still too early to draw firm conclusions about winners and losers. Cable execs will tell you – we’re doing just fine, thank you very much. Telecom execs have a certain arrogance as well. Both think they have the winning strategy. The beauty of a free market dictates that consumers will ultimately decide. Both industries would do well to listen. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more insight on this, read John Dvorak’s MarketWatch.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/its-phone-vs-cable-again/story.aspx?guid=%7B46EC854A%2D2387%2D449C%2D9EA5%2DFCF3EF7F936D%7D&amp;amp;dist=dist_smartbrief&amp;amp;dist=dist_smartbrief/&quot;&gt;column&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/55#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/58">IPTV</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:56:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My Fiber is Better Than Yours</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/65</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Verizon and Cablevision are battling it out in the New York metropolitan area, with claims of who has the best fiber network. Verizon doesn’t take kindly to the fact that Cablevision is clearly trying to counter Verizon’s FiOS publicity of an advanced FTTH network. While Cablevision has a very advanced network, it is fiber to the node, with coax connections to the home. The real question to ponder is do consumers really care whether fiber is extended all the way to their home. Probably not – both networks are providing an advanced triple play experience. Time will tell whether one has a true advantage over the other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read this Washington Post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/20/AR2007032000868.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; for more insight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/65#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/61">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/34">FiOS</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/33">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Competition Reaches All Corners of the U.S.</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/45</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Qwest recently introduced extended area local calling in portions of South Dakota, due in part to remain competitive. The Northern Hills area of South Dakota has seen its fair share of telecom competition, and some say, Qwest was a little slow to react. A fiber network overbuilder, Black Hills FiberCom, and Midcontinent Cable introduced triple play bundles year’s ago, causing Qwest customers to flee in great numbers. Some say Qwest is too late with their latest offering, but this is a great “microscope” example that competition exists everywhere, including the “heartland.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read this Rapid City Journal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2007/03/12/news/top/news001h.txt&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; for great analysis of this situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/45#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/46">Competition</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/45">Qwest</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/47">Triple Play</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:03:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
