Newsletter
Google Left Banner
BroadbandTV Will Gain at the Expense of Cable/DBS/TelcoTV
28 Jan, 2008
BroadbandTV will deliver the a la carte programming nirvana that consumer’s desire, and it will do so at the subscription pay TV model’s peril. That’s according to this recent BusinessWeek article, Winning the Broadband TV Game. The authors postulate several theories which suggest that consumers will adopt broadbandTV to gain access to the content model of "give-me-what-I-want-when-I-want-it,” and reject the current model of “take-what-we-offer-you.” They also suggest that 40% of U.S. consumers will have some way of connecting their TV displays directly or indirectly to the Internet within 3 years. By five years, that number will grow to 70% and represent a true mass market. The tipping point is well on its way because televisions are now shipping with Ethernet ports and broadbandTV enabled gaming consoles will be in one third of all U.S. TV households by 2010. The implications suggest that cable, DBS, and telcoTV providers are in trouble. “The barriers that have long inhibited Internet-based TV are beginning to crumble. The TV manufacturers will win; the gaming companies will win; the best new platforms blending personalized and branded content will win; Hollywood will win; and consumers will win. And, unless they find ways to adapt very quickly, telecoms and cable companies will lose.”
To be fair, the BusinessWeek article is authored by Herve Utheza and Gary Morgenthaler, both of whom are heavily invested in the broadbandTV space. But they bring up some interesting issues. The reality of broadbandTV today is it’s simply too complicated for average consumers to install, find, and watch content consistently. Should those barriers be lowered through things like broadbandTV enabled set-top-boxes, game consoles, and even the televisions themselves, the story could change. If broadbandTV does truly become plug and play, we may very well see some Utheza and Morganthaler broadbandTV predictions come true. Cable and telcoTV providers may be challenged to adapt their business and revenue models to ensure they don’t concede their subscription TV business to the burgeoning broadbandTV ecosystem. DBS may feel the broadbandTV pinch more, because they don't have broadband connections to the home, making a broadbandTV strategy somewhat more complicated for them.
digg this story
google
About Telecompetitor
Telecompetitor is a leading industry blog covering the telecom competitive landscape. We provide insight, analysis, and commentary on the issues and implications of the evolving telecom competitive landscape.
a publication of
Channel
Webinars/Events
Upcoming Webinars
Packet Optical Networks – Enabling Your Future
Dec 16, 2008
Upcoming Events
NTCA Wireless Symposium
Jan 7-9, 2009 - Austin, TX
Featured Article
Should Telephone Service be Free?
12 Oct, 2008
Comcast announced a new promotion last week that offers 12 months of free basic cable service for new customers who also sign up for an additional service. Customers who don’t want an additional service can get Comcast’s basic service of about 20 -30 channels for $10/month. The promotion is tied to the digital TV transition of February 2009 and entices potential customers to avoid the transition “hassle” by getting “free” cable service. “The simple fact is that basic cable is the easiest path through the digital transition and now consumers can get it for free,” said Derek Harrar, General Manager and Senior Vice President, Video Services for Comcast in a company statement. This move is similar to strategies pursued by other video service providers, who are hoping to leverage the digital TV transition for new subscriber additions.
But is this strategy a leading indicator for the future? Should basic core services like basic cable and basic telephone service be offered for free, used as a “carrot” to entice customers to buy “more important” services like broadband? Maybe a very basic phone service, with no LD, access to landline 911, and maybe outgoing service only (to avoid telemarketers) should be a free component of a bundled offering. Such a wireline service may appeal to a customer who previously cut the cord for wireless only, but also needs broadband. There is a growing portion of the population who find the value of traditional wireline phone service elsewhere – either through wireless or broadband/IP services. But, if they could get the security of landline 911, and an extra dial tone in their home as a free value add for subscribing to broadband (or video from a telco’s perspective), maybe a telco’s bundled offering may look more attractive than a comparable cable offering. I realize this idea is not appealing to the hundreds of ILECs who are a part of the current access/settlement system (in fact, it couldn’t work in the context of today’s regulatory structure), but I wonder whether it’s inevitable. In this possible future scenario, the current settlement system adapts to broadband as the underlying service, as opposed to voice.
This scenario cuts both ways. From a cable company’s perspective, a growing portion of the population is turning to the Internet as a source for their video content, and no longer see value in paying for a broad package of video as a part of a traditional subscription pay-TV service. But, if they could receive basic TV (which includes local broadcast affiliates) as a free value add for buying broadband, maybe the cable bundle is more attractive. In a true IP/broadband world, very basic phone and video service is relatively easy to deliver, and has little impact on bandwidth and network performance. Maybe the digital transition is opening the door to a future where free basic services are a regular component of a bundled offering. Thoughts?