<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://telecompetitor.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Pioneer Telephone</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/90/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Pioneer Telephone Cooperative Confronts IPTV HD Challenge</title>
 <link>http://telecompetitor.com/node/86</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Who in the world came up with this HD idea anyway? That has to be on the mind at times for IPTV operators like Pioneer Telephone in Oklahoma, who are using copper based DSL platforms. Scott Ulsaker of Pioneer agrees, but also understands that HD will be required in order to compete. As Ulsaker freely admits, a “me too” IPTV service gets you in the door, but advanced IP applications and HD is what will separate you from the pack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cable 360 Net talks with Ulsaker in this interesting &lt;a target=&quot;”_blank”&quot; href=&quot;http://www.cable360.net/technology/23175.html&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://telecompetitor.com/node/86#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/89">ADSL2+</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/88">HD</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/58">IPTV</category>
 <category domain="http://telecompetitor.com/taxonomy/term/90">Pioneer Telephone</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">86 at http://telecompetitor.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
